Case Studies Cross-border Complaints

 

Amicable resolution in cross-border complaints — Yahoo EMEA Limited

The DPC received a complaint in March 2021 from the Bavarian data protection authority on behalf of a Bavarian complainant against Yahoo EMEA Limited. Under the One Stop Shop (OSS) mechanism created by the GDPR, the location of a company’s main EU establishment dictates which EU authority will act as the lead supervisory authority (LSA) in relation to any complaints received. Once the lead authority is established, the authority that received the complaint acts as a concerned supervisory authority (CSA). The CSA is the intermediary between the LSA and the individual. In this case, the DPC is the LSA, as the company complained of has its main establishment in Ireland.

The complainant in this matter had lost access to his email account following an update on his computer . The complainant noted that he had engaged with Yahoo in order to regain access and was asked for information relating to the account in order to authenticate his ownership of it . The complainant asserted that he had provided this information . However, Yahoo informed the complainant that it could not verify his identity with the use of the information that it had been provided .

The complainant was unclear which information he had provided was not correct and thus continued to give the same answers to the security questions . As Yahoo could not authenticate the complainant’s ownership of the account, it recommended that he create a new email account .

The complainant was not satisfied with this solution and made a complaint to his local supervisory authority, who referred the complaint on the DPC in its role as Lead Supervisory Authority for Yahoo .

This complaint was identified as potentially being capable of amicable resolution under Section 109 of the Data Protection Act 2018, with both the individual and data controller agreeing to work with the DPC to try to amicably resolve the matter .

The DPC contacted Yahoo on the matter, and Yahoo took a proactive approach and immediately noted its desire to reach out to the complainant directly to seek to resolve the issue as soon as possible . Yahoo thereafter quickly confirmed to the DPC that its member services team made contact with the complainant, who provided alternative information that enabled Yahoo to success- fully validate identity of the requester and subsequently restore their account access .

Key Takeaway

  • This case highlights that further direct engagement between the parties during the amicable resolution process can often achieve a swift resolution for data subjects . It further highlights that a proactive approach on the part of data controllers in the early stages of a complaint can often resolve matters and avoid the need to engage in a lengthy complaint handling process .